The issue of common intellectual property ownership is therefore even more complex when the same IP product is protected in several jurisdictions, because different countries have different IP laws. In addition, parties based in different countries that deal with common ownership in accordance with their individual national laws may have very different expectations and/or experiences as to what it means to be a co-owner. There are differences in intellectual property law or in the interpretation of intellectual property law between legal systems. The „territorial“ nature of intellectual property refers to the fact that countries adopt their own intellectual property laws, usually by law, and these intellectual property laws have no application or application outside the country where they are enacted. If a lease is common, each co-owner will own a share of the property, for example. B 50% or 80%. The share is undivided, which means that they have the right to occupy the entire property, even if their share is small. There is still the unit of possession and no physical division of the country. The relevance of the interest is evident in the sale, death or distribution of property income. When a joint venture or cooperative business is dissolved in the event of early termination of a contract for a particular reason, shareholders may have disputes over how the intellectual property that arises during the existence of the business should be transferred or recognized, whether the investigation period is co-owner or not.
In this case, they also face legal risks similar to those in scenarios where there is no ambiguous ownership agreement on ip ownership. The loss of collective ip ownership is probably an advantageous co-ownership, although IP Draughs prefers to explain it expressly (z.B. in co-ownership agreements where the parties agree on how the investigation period will be managed and marketed). It should be noted that the title of Section 36 of the Patents Act 1977 is „co-ownership.“ The co-ownership also seems to be related to the fact that the collective owners can agree on different (uneven) parts of the investigation period, on which, see below, see below. The growing awareness of intellectual property (IP) and the strengthening of cooperation between companies are pushing an increasing number of companies to participate in market competition by developing new products. This is both both pros and cons. On the one hand, the growing activities of collaborative development are helping to promote and stimulate research and development of new technologies.